Test image of "Voter" application |
In order to get more Millennials involved in the democratic
process, the Federal Election Commission has contracted IAC/InterActiveCorp to
develop a voting app that operates similarly to their popular dating application “Tinder.” The intention is to use the system in the 2016 presidential election. The hope, according to the FEC, is that with people able to vote for
candidates from the convenience of their phone, using a fun interface, they
will be more likely to participate.
Some are worried about the security of using wireless, online networks, especially in light of the
recent break-ins of a number of Apple Cloud accounts that are owned by celebrities. IAC has assured
critics that their security measures are much more reliable than people realize.
A representative of the company, Cheryl Chan, made a case
that digital voting is at least more reliable than the absentee
mail-in system: “There, you have a bunch of retired people, hired from a temp
agency, spending eight hours a day comparing signatures on envelopes to
signatures displayed on a computer monitor. Our security software doesn’t have
poor eyesight, get tired, or get bored, so I’m pretty confident.”
Most opponents aren’t dissuaded by this, saying that the
entire concept undermines the seriousness of the action. “Electing the leader
of a nation isn’t something you should do in-between texting and watching
Vines,” said Dominic Sanchez, a former California
state senator, who is leading a non-profit group demanding that the FEC repeal
the decision. “Voting is a civil duty, and should be done with a knowledge of
the weight behind it.”
FEC administrator Kevin Palmer dismissed the concerns. “The
data shows that people put about the same amount of thought into how they pick
their president as they do choosing who to hook up with on a dating
app. Not very much.”
No comments:
Post a Comment